Meta Analysis Example on The Impact of Nurse-Led Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) on Reducing Anxiety in Patients with Heart Disease

Meta Analysis Example

Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), encompassing conditions such as coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure, and atrial fibrillation, remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally (Nso et al., 2023). In addition to their physical impact, cardiovascular conditions often result in psychological distress, particularly anxiety and depression. These psychological issues are highly prevalent among patients with heart disease and can significantly worsen clinical outcomes, leading to poorer quality of life, reduced adherence to treatment, and increased healthcare utilization (Yohannes, 2018). The prevalence of anxiety and depression in cardiovascular patients has been reported to be as high as 30%, with these conditions being associated with negative cardiovascular events and increased mortality rates (Mourad et al., 2024). Managing psychological distress in heart disease patients is, therefore, a critical component of comprehensive cardiovascular care.

Nurse-led cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has emerged as a promising intervention to address anxiety and depression in cardiovascular patients. CBT is a well-established, evidence-based psychological treatment aimed at identifying and changing negative thought patterns that contribute to emotional distress (Légère & Rhéaume, 2020). While CBT has proven to be effective for anxiety and depression across various patient populations, its application in cardiovascular disease management has gained increasing attention. Nurse-led CBT, delivered by trained nurses within the clinical setting, offers a more accessible and cost-effective approach to managing these psychological symptoms (Luo et al., 2018). Unlike traditional therapist-led interventions, nurse-led CBT can be integrated into routine cardiovascular care, leveraging the existing patient-nurse relationship to improve both mental and physical health outcomes.

Patients with cardiovascular disease often experience psychological distress due to the chronic nature of the disease, the fear of worsening health, and the uncertainty regarding long-term outcomes (Mourad et al., 2024). Anxiety in particular is prevalent in heart disease patients, driven by concerns about disease progression, hospitalizations, and mortality (Gheiasi et al., 2024). This psychological distress can negatively impact the patient’s physical health, as it may hinder treatment adherence, increase the risk of complications, and contribute to poorer clinical outcomes. Depression is another common comorbidity, and it has been linked to worse cardiovascular outcomes, including increased rates of hospitalization and mortality (Ski et al., 2025). Given the significant burden of anxiety and depression in cardiovascular patients, addressing these psychological factors is crucial for improving both patient quality of life and clinical outcomes.

Nurse-led CBT offers a promising solution to these barriers (Ski et al., 2025). Nurses, who are already integral members of the care team for heart disease patients, have the potential to provide psychological support through CBT interventions. Studies have demonstrated that nurse-led CBT is effective in managing psychological symptoms, including anxiety and depression, in heart disease patients. For example, Mourad et al. (2024) conducted a study that examined the impact of a nurse-led internet-delivered CBT program on healthcare utilization in patients with cardiovascular disease and depressive symptoms. The study found that nurse-led CBT significantly reduced healthcare use and improved psychological outcomes, demonstrating the feasibility and effectiveness of this approach (Nso et al., 2023). Furthermore, nurse-led interventions can be delivered in a variety of formats, such as face-to-face therapy, telephone counseling, or internet-based programs, which increases accessibility and flexibility for patients (Kwek et al., 2025).

The role of nurses in providing CBT is further supported by research showing that nurse-led interventions can significantly improve psychological outcomes in cardiovascular patients. For instance, Gheiasi et al. (2024) found that a nurse-led CBT program improved sleep quality and reduced psychological distress in patients undergoing open heart surgery. Similarly, He et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of nurse-led tele-interventions, including CBT, in coronary heart disease patients. The study found that tele-interventions significantly improved anxiety, depression, and self-efficacy, supporting the potential of nurse-led CBT in both traditional and digital health settings.

The growing use of digital health technologies, including telemedicine, has further expanded the reach of nurse-led CBT. Internet-based CBT programs and telehealth interventions offer an opportunity to deliver psychological care to patients who may not otherwise have access to traditional therapy. Digital interventions can overcome geographical and logistical barriers, making it easier for patients in rural or underserved areas to receive treatment. Kwek et al. (2025) demonstrated that therapist-supported, internet-based CBT interventions were effective in reducing anxiety, depression, and improving quality of life among cardiovascular patients, highlighting the potential for digital solutions to enhance the accessibility of nurse-led CBT.

Purpose of the Study

While individual studies have demonstrated the efficacy of nurse-led CBT in reducing anxiety and improving psychological outcomes in cardiovascular patients, the evidence remains fragmented. Variability in study designs, intervention methods, and patient populations complicates the ability to draw definitive conclusions. To address this gap, the current meta-analysis aims to synthesize the existing RCTs that evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-led CBT for reducing anxiety in cardiovascular patients. By synthesizing data from RCTs, which are considered the gold standard in clinical research, this study will provide robust evidence on the impact of nurse-led CBT in this patient population. This meta-analysis will not only contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting nurse-led CBT but will also provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of this intervention across different delivery methods, patient groups, and healthcare settings. The findings will have important implications for clinical practice, helping to inform the integration of nurse-led CBT into routine cardiovascular care.

Research Aim

The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-led cognitive behavioral therapy in reducing anxiety and improving psychological outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Research Questions

• What is the effect of nurse-led cognitive behavioral therapy on reducing anxiety in patients with cardiovascular disease?
• How does nurse-led CBT influence the psychological outcomes, such as depression and quality of life, in patients with cardiovascular disease?
• What are the most effective formats (e.g., in-person, telephone, internet-based) for delivering nurse-led cognitive behavioral therapy to cardiovascular patients?

Methodology

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-led CBT on anxiety and other psychological outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. To ensure the highest quality and relevance of the data, strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were established.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Study Design: Only RCTs evaluating nurse-led CBT interventions were included. These studies had to report on outcomes such as anxiety, depression, or quality of life in patients with cardiovascular disease.
• Population: Studies involving patients diagnosed with cardiovascular diseases, including coronary artery disease, heart failure, or atrial fibrillation, were eligible. The population had to include both male and female adult patients.
• Intervention: The intervention had to be nurse-led CBT, either in person, via telephone, or internet-based programs. The intervention must have been explicitly delivered by a trained nurse.
• Outcome Measures: The studies had to measure anxiety as the primary outcome, with secondary outcomes including depression, quality of life, and other psychological markers.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Non-RCT Designs: Studies that were not randomized controlled trials were excluded, as RCTs are considered the gold standard for evaluating treatment efficacy.
• Non-nurse-led CBT: Studies that involved therapist-led CBT or other forms of psychological interventions not delivered by nurses were excluded.
• Non-cardiovascular Populations: Studies focused on non-cardiovascular populations, such as those with chronic pain or respiratory diseases, were excluded.

These criteria ensured that the meta-analysis focused specifically on nurse-led CBT for cardiovascular patients, thus maintaining relevance and consistency across studies.

Search Strategy

A comprehensive search strategy was developed to identify relevant studies. The following databases were systematically searched: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and PsycINFO. The search was limited to studies published between 2000 and 2025 to capture the most up-to-date evidence. Keywords used in the search included “nurse-led CBT,” “cardiovascular disease,” “anxiety,” “randomized controlled trial,” and “psychological interventions.” Boolean operators such as AND, OR, and NOT were used to combine these terms effectively.

Additionally, the reference lists of relevant articles were reviewed to identify any additional studies not captured in the initial database search. Only studies published in English were considered for inclusion.

Data Extraction

Once the studies were identified, data extraction was performed independently by two researchers to minimize bias and ensure accuracy. Key data were extracted from each study, including:

• Study Characteristics: Author(s), year of publication, sample size, and study design.
• Patient Characteristics: Age, gender, and specific cardiovascular conditions.
• Intervention Details: Duration, format (in-person, telephone, internet-based), and frequency of nurse-led CBT sessions.
• Outcome Measures: Primary and secondary outcomes, including anxiety scores (e.g., Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), depression, and quality of life indicators.

Disagreements in data extraction were resolved through discussion and consultation with a third reviewer.

Risk of Bias Assessment

The risk of bias for each included study was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (Ahn & Kang, 2018). This tool evaluates six domains: random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and outcome assessors, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other potential biases. Each domain was rated as low, high, or unclear risk of bias. Studies with a high risk of bias in critical domains were excluded from the final analysis to maintain the quality and reliability of the results.

In addition, publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot and Egger’s test. These methods help detect whether the meta-analysis results are skewed by the selective publication of positive findings.

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using the R programming language and the meta package, which are widely used for conducting meta-analyses in clinical research (Balduzzi, Rücker, & Schwarzer, 2019). The effect size was calculated using the standardized mean difference (SMD) for continuous outcomes such as anxiety, depression, and quality of life. For studies that reported dichotomous data (e.g., the proportion of patients who experienced significant anxiety reduction), the odds ratio (OR) was calculated.

The meta-analysis used a random-effects model to account for variability between studies. This model was chosen because the studies included in this meta-analysis likely differed in patient characteristics, intervention methods, and outcome measures (Mikolajewicz & Komarova, 2019). The random-effects model assumes that there is true variability in the effect sizes across studies, making it more appropriate for the heterogeneous data typically found in clinical trials.

Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic, which quantifies the proportion of total variation across studies that is due to heterogeneity rather than chance. An I² value greater than 50% indicates substantial heterogeneity, and subgroup analyses were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity, such as different types of cardiovascular disease or different delivery formats for CBT.

The results of the meta-analysis were presented as forest plots, which visually depict the effect sizes for each study along with the pooled effect size. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the findings by excluding studies with high risk of bias or extreme effect sizes (Cleophas & Zwinderman, 2017).

Data Synthesis and Interpretation

The results of the meta-analysis were synthesized qualitatively and quantitatively. The primary outcome—reduction in anxiety—was examined first, followed by secondary outcomes including depression and quality of life. If studies reported multiple measures of the same outcome, the most frequently used or most validated measure was prioritized for inclusion. The pooled effect sizes were interpreted in terms of clinical significance, with a focus on whether the intervention leads to meaningful improvements in psychological outcomes for cardiovascular patients.

Results

The systematic literature search process involved searching three databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. PubMed provided biomedical literature, Cochrane focused on high-quality RCTs, and Scopus offered a multidisciplinary range of research. A total of 500 records were initially identified, with 10 additional records from other sources. After removing duplicates, 480 records were screened, and 430 were excluded based on irrelevant titles and abstracts. Full-text assessments were conducted on 50 studies, with 40 excluded due to wrong study designs or non-relevant populations. Ultimately, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative and quantitative synthesis, as depicted in the PRISMA flowchart.

This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness of nurse-led CBT in reducing anxiety and improving psychological outcomes in cardiovascular disease patients. The analysis included 10 RCTs, with a total sample size of 2,510 participants. The studies involved various formats of nurse-led CBT, including in-person, telephone-based, and internet-delivered interventions, targeting patients with conditions such as coronary artery disease, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation.

The overall pooled effect size for nurse-led CBT was calculated as Cohen’s d = 0.50 (95% CI: 0.40, 0.60), indicating a moderate effect on reducing anxiety and improving psychological well-being. The effect size was statistically significant with a p-value of < 0.01, suggesting that nurse-led CBT has a meaningful impact on psychological outcomes in cardiovascular patients. This effect was consistent across the studies, as demonstrated by the I² statistic of 56.4%, indicating moderate heterogeneity between the studies (p-value < 0.01). The Q statistic was 25.6 (p-value < 0.01), further confirming the variability between the studies, but the effect size remained robust even when heterogeneity was considered (see Table 4: Heterogeneity Table).

Subgroup analyses revealed that the effectiveness of nurse-led CBT was similar across various patient demographics. The effect size for patients aged under 60 was Cohen’s d = 0.50 (95% CI: 0.35, 0.65), while for those aged 60 and above, the effect size was Cohen’s d = 0.55 (95% CI: 0.40, 0.70). Gender-based subgroup analysis showed a slightly higher effect for females (Cohen’s d = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.50, 0.70) compared to males (Cohen’s d = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.30, 0.60). These findings suggest that the intervention was effective across different age and gender groups, with a notable impact for females (see Table 6: Subgroup Analysis Table).

In terms of intervention formats, internet-based CBT showed a moderate effect size of Cohen’s d = 0.45 (95% CI: 0.30, 0.60), while telephone-based interventions produced a higher effect size of Cohen’s d = 0.55 (95% CI: 0.40, 0.70). These results indicate that while internet-based CBT is effective, telephone-based nurse-led CBT may yield slightly stronger results, particularly in terms of patient engagement and outcomes (see Table 6: Subgroup Analysis Table).

A sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the robustness of the findings. Removing any one study did not significantly alter the overall effect size, indicating the stability of the results. The effect sizes after removing individual studies ranged from Cohen’s d = 0.33 to Cohen’s d = 0.58, with no significant change in the confidence intervals (see Table 5: Sensitivity Analysis Table).

Lastly, the publication bias analysis, including Egger’s test, revealed a statistically significant result (p-value < 0.05), indicating potential publication bias. However, funnel plot symmetry analysis suggested that the studies were reasonably symmetrical, suggesting that bias did not significantly impact the overall findings (see Table 7: Publication Bias Table). The nurse-led CBT demonstrates moderate effectiveness in reducing anxiety and improving psychological outcomes in cardiovascular disease patients, with consistent results across different subgroups and intervention formats.

The forest plot presents compelling evidence supporting the effectiveness of nurse-led cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) interventions for reducing anxiety in patients with heart disease. The meta-analysis incorporates ten randomized controlled trials with a total sample size of 2,110 participants, demonstrating consistent positive outcomes across all included studies.

Overall Effect Size and Significance: The pooled effect size of Cohen’s d = 0.50 (95% CI: 0.40-0.60, p < 0.01) represents a moderate to large therapeutic effect, indicating that nurse-led CBT interventions result in clinically meaningful anxiety reduction compared to standard care. This effect size suggests that patients receiving nurse-led CBT experience approximately half a standard deviation improvement in anxiety outcomes, which translates to substantial clinical benefit.

Individual Study Performance: All ten studies demonstrated positive effect sizes ranging from 0.35 to 0.60, with confidence intervals consistently excluding zero. The strongest effects were observed in studies by Sharma & Wong (2020) and Choi & Choi (2021), both showing Cohen’s d = 0.60, while Meyer et al. (2020) showed the most conservative effect (d = 0.35). Notably, even the smallest effect size represents a small-to-moderate clinical benefit, reinforcing the consistency of findings across diverse patient populations and intervention modalities.

Heterogeneity and Study Quality: The I² statistic of 56.4% indicates moderate heterogeneity between studies, suggesting some variation in treatment effects. This heterogeneity may reflect differences in intervention delivery methods (face-to-face, telephone-based, internet-based), patient populations (various cardiac conditions), or methodological variations. The risk of bias assessment revealed predominantly low-risk studies, with only one high-risk study (Meyer et al.), enhancing confidence in the overall findings and supporting the robustness of the pooled estimate.

Discussion

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-led cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in reducing anxiety and improving psychological outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). The findings from the included studies provide strong evidence supporting the use of nurse-led CBT as an effective intervention to reduce anxiety, improve depression, and enhance the overall psychological well-being of cardiovascular patients. The results contribute to a growing body of literature suggesting that integrating psychological interventions, particularly CBT, into cardiovascular care can be beneficial for both mental and physical health outcomes.

Effectiveness of Nurse-Led CBT for Anxiety Reduction

The overall pooled effect size for nurse-led CBT in this meta-analysis was Cohen’s d = 0.50 (95% CI: 0.40, 0.60), indicating a moderate effect on reducing anxiety among cardiovascular patients. This result is consistent with findings from previous studies, which also report moderate to large effects of CBT on anxiety reduction in patients with heart disease. For instance, Sharma and Wong (2020) found that nurse-led CBT effectively reduced anxiety and depression in heart failure patients, with a similar effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.60). Additionally, Kang and Kim (2022) reported an effect size of Cohen’s d = 0.52 for nurse-led CBT in atrial fibrillation patients, indicating that the effectiveness of nurse-led CBT is consistent across different cardiovascular conditions (Table 2). The significant reduction in anxiety in the present analysis, similar to these earlier studies, reinforces the utility of nurse-led CBT in addressing the psychological distress faced by heart disease patients.

However, Meyer et al. (2020) reported a smaller effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.35) for anxiety reduction in post-myocardial infarction patients, which suggests that the efficacy of nurse-led CBT may vary depending on patient characteristics and the nature of the cardiovascular condition. These results also highlight the potential for further research to explore factors that influence the effectiveness of CBT, such as the stage of disease or comorbidities, as differences in effect sizes across studies may be due to the heterogeneity of the patient population.

Influence on Psychological Outcomes: Depression and Quality of Life

In addition to anxiety reduction, nurse-led CBT in this meta-analysis was found to have a significant impact on other psychological outcomes, particularly depression and quality of life. Many studies included in this analysis assessed the effects of nurse-led CBT on both anxiety and depression, confirming that CBT provides benefits beyond anxiety reduction. For example, Smith and Patel (2019) reported that nurse-led CBT significantly improved both anxiety and depression in cardiovascular patients, with a pooled effect size of Cohen’s d = 0.50 (Table 2). The pooled effect size of 0.50 in the current meta-analysis is consistent with findings from earlier studies, supporting the idea that nurse-led CBT has broad applications in improving psychological well-being in cardiovascular patients.

The subgroup analysis revealed that nurse-led CBT had a particularly large effect on females (Cohen’s d = 0.60), which mirrors previous findings suggesting that women may experience greater psychological distress related to cardiovascular conditions, possibly due to social, psychological, or biological factors (Table 6). The positive results in the female subgroup underscore the need for targeted interventions to address the unique psychological needs of women with heart disease. Furthermore, the subgroup analysis also found that patients aged ≥60 years experienced a slightly higher effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.55), suggesting that older patients may benefit more from nurse-led CBT (Table 6). This aligns with research by Robinson and Chen (2019), who reported positive psychological outcomes in older patients with heart disease, potentially due to the greater psychological burden that older individuals face when managing chronic conditions.

Delivery Formats and Effectiveness

The analysis also explored the effectiveness of different delivery formats for nurse-led CBT, including in-person, telephone-based, and internet-based interventions. The results suggest that telephone-based nurse-led CBT produced the highest effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.55), followed by internet-based CBT (Cohen’s d = 0.45), with in-person interventions showing slightly lower but still significant effects (Cohen’s d = 0.50) (Table 6). These findings support the notion that CBT delivered through various formats can be equally effective, which is important for increasing access to interventions, particularly for patients in remote or underserved areas. Previous studies, including Anderson and Liao (2018), have also demonstrated the efficacy of internet-based CBT in managing anxiety and depression, highlighting the flexibility and accessibility of digital interventions.

The moderate effect of internet-based CBT is particularly relevant in the context of the growing use of telehealth in cardiovascular care, as it offers a scalable solution to reach a broader patient population. However, the higher effect size observed with telephone-based interventions suggests that direct patient-provider communication may enhance engagement and adherence compared to digital-only approaches, which may be limited by technological barriers or patient preferences.

Heterogeneity and Sensitivity Analysis

The heterogeneity of the studies included in the meta-analysis was assessed using the I² statistic, which was found to be 56.4%. This indicates moderate variability between the studies, which could be attributed to differences in the patient population, intervention characteristics, or study quality. The sensitivity analysis, which removed individual studies to assess the stability of the results, revealed that the overall effect size remained robust, with minimal variation in the confidence intervals after removing any one study (Table 5). These findings suggest that the conclusions of this meta-analysis are not driven by outliers or high-risk studies, reinforcing the validity of the results.

Publication Bias

To assess potential publication bias, funnel plot symmetry and Egger’s test were used. The results indicated that the studies included in the analysis were reasonably symmetrical, suggesting minimal publication bias (Table 7). However, the p-value from Egger’s test (< 0.05) indicated a small degree of bias, which is common in meta-analyses. Despite this, the results of this analysis should still be considered reliable, as the funnel plot suggests that the potential bias is unlikely to have a significant impact on the overall conclusions.

Limitations and Future Research

While the findings from this meta-analysis provide strong evidence for the effectiveness of nurse-led CBT in reducing anxiety and improving psychological outcomes in cardiovascular disease patients, there are several limitations to consider. First, the studies included in this analysis varied in their methodological quality, with some studies exhibiting a moderate to high risk of bias (e.g., Meyer et al., 2020). Future research should focus on improving the rigor of study designs, particularly in terms of randomization, blinding, and sample size, to further strengthen the evidence base for nurse-led CBT.

Additionally, the variation in effect sizes across subgroups and delivery formats suggests the need for more targeted research to explore factors that influence the effectiveness of nurse-led CBT. Future studies could investigate the impact of different patient characteristics, such as disease stage, comorbidities, and socio-demographic factors, on the outcomes of CBT. Moreover, research should also explore the long-term effects of nurse-led CBT on anxiety, depression, and quality of life, as many of the included studies focused on short-term outcomes.

Conclusion

Nurse-led CBT is an effective intervention for reducing anxiety and improving psychological well-being in cardiovascular disease patients. The results of this meta-analysis, which indicate moderate effect sizes for both anxiety and depression, are consistent with previous studies that have explored the benefits of psychological interventions in heart disease populations. The effectiveness of nurse-led CBT across various delivery formats suggests that it is a flexible and scalable intervention that can be integrated into cardiovascular care. Further research is needed to explore the long-term benefits and optimal delivery methods for this intervention, with a focus on addressing patient-specific factors to maximize its impact.

You can download and read the PDF version of this meta analysis example with all the Tables and Figures from the link below

Quick Links to Meta-Analysis Resources – Learn More

• Discover over 100 insightful topics for conducting meta-analysis, along with examples of systematic reviews in the article Best 100+ Meta-Analysis Topics | Systematic Review Examples.
• Learn how to structure your meta-analysis and develop a comprehensive protocol with PRISMA guidelines in the article Meta-Analysis Template | Systematic Review Protocol & PRISMA.
• Follow a practical 5-step guide to outline and execute effective meta-analysis methodologies in the article Meta-Analysis Outline & Methodology | 5-Step Practical Guide.
• Understand how meta-analysis is applied in medical research using the Cochrane Study Design, an essential resource for evidence-based practices in the article Meta-Analysis in Medical Research | Cochrane Study Design.